Saturday, August 30, 2008

For Immediate Release: Local Citizen Appeals to the California Attorney General's Office to Investigate the County of Los Angeles

For Immediate Release
August 30, 2008

LOCAL CITIZEN APPEALS TO THE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO INVESTIGATE THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Irvine, CA – Irvine citizen Ry an O ls han appealed to the California Attorney General's Office today to investigate the County of Los Angeles. Under the leadership of Department Director Marcia Mayeda, the Department of Animal Care and Control has continued to engage in alleged violations of Department and Board of Supervisor policy and procedure and State and Federal law. The most blatant alleged violations of the law and policy and procedure include:
  • Causing animals unnecessary suffering, sickness, and death
  • Not providing animals with proper medical care
  • Not providing animals with adequate nutrition, shelter, exercise, and water
  • Not treating animals kindly and humanely
  • Routine failure to hold employees accountable
  • Retaliating against employees, volunteers, and members of the public for exposing patterns of neglect.
"Earlier this month, Department Director Marcia Mayeda was under review by County Counsel regarding an email I produced to CEO William Fujioka instructing staff to delete emails while under an audit conducted by the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency," said Ry an O ls han. "Mr. Fujioka did not allow the Office of County Investigations, Federal Drug Enforcement Agency, or US Attorney to conduct an investigation. County Counsel found no wrongdoing on Mayeda's part despite that the contents of the email stated, 'Josie, thanks for your comments – i agree that everyone did an outstanding job on this matter! However, we do not need a paper trail on this. Everyone, please delete these emails from your computers and empty the trash files. Thanks!'"

"I'm aware of another incident where Mayeda instructed staff to delete emails and empty their trash files so they don't leave a paper trail," stated O ls han. "I informed Mr. Fujioka of this and so far he has shown no interest in investigating this new allegation."

"In 2006-2007, Dr. Dena Mangiamele conducted an audit of the Department," said O ls han. "Many of her findings were both disturbing and shocking. Dr. Mangiamele noted that the Department possessed only one controlled substance certificate for all 6 shelters, employees falsified controlled substance logs, inaccurate and non-compliant controlled substance logs, and controlled substances not stored pursuant to Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Section 1301.75. All of this is in violation of Federal law. Dr. Mangiamele also witnessed a conscious unanesthetized cat that was euthanized by intracardiac injection, which is a violation of California Penal Code Section 597, and she noticed several animals that were irremediably suffering and were subjected to further pain and suffering by not being euthanizing immediately, and instead were subjected to a 4 day hold period. Dr. Mangiamele's report also notes that non-certified employees were performing euthanasia and unregistered veterinary technicians were inducing anesthesia."

A copy of Dr. Mangiamele's report can be downloaded from the LA County DACC Watch Blog at http://lacdacc.blogspot.com.

###

Read More...

Friday, August 29, 2008

Obstruction of justice investigation (Updated)

Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:31:00 -0700
To: William Fujioka
Subject: Re: Obstruction of justice investigation

William Fujioka:

I have not misstated the facts. When I talked to Troy Anderson of the Daily News he said he talked to you and told me that you said County Counsel completed their investigation and found no wrongdoing as the email was sent shortly after the audit, that you would be sitting down and discussing what happened with Marcia, and that you couldn’t discuss much more because of the personnel nature of the investigation. Based upon what Troy Anderson told me, I asked you a series of questions.

If you reread where I mentioned your quote from the LA Times, I was not stating that you have taken advantage of the fact that you weren't initially sworn to protect the County Charter. I was pointing out the irony of the quote as Marcia and her department have been allowed to get away with violations of State and Federal law and Department and Board of Supervisor Policy and Procedure despite that you have been provided with evidence demonstrating said violations.

I would prefer our communications be via email. Often people insist to communicate only via phone when they don’t want to leave a paper trail.

In my emails, many of which have become blog entries, I have not attacked you. I have stated factual information, all of which can be backed up with evidence. In one of your email replies to me you stated that you would have your staff get back to me the following week, and they never did despite my numerous follow-up emails.

My general policy on comments is to post all comments as long as they are not of a derogatory or threatening manner as I’m very open to constructive criticism. I searched my LA County blog and am unable to find the extremely racist comment about Asians you mentioned. If you provide me with a link to the post that contains the comment, I will review the comment and delete it if it is of an extremely racist nature. I’m a firm believer in accountability. If there is any wrongdoing, I will be the first to step up and apologize for publishing such a comment.

What stands out most in your reply is that you didn’t inquire more about the other incident I mentioned where Marcia instructed staff to delete emails and empty their trash files.


On 8/30/08 7:50 AM, "Fujioka, William T" wrote:

Again, you have unfortunately misstated the facts. First, our County Counsel was asked to review this issue given it's legal consequences. There are other actions being taken I'm willing to share with you. Please call me next week to discuss.

With respect to the comment I made when I was sworn in, you didn't state the true circumstances. The oath read and presented to me did not include a reference to the County Charter. In jest, I mentioned that I then wasn't requried to defend this doctrine. However, I immediately amended my comments to state that I would absolutely defend the Charter. Given that you were not there, you missed this important fact.

Your message references a meeting in my office. I met with you out of respect for you and what you support. I do not meet with many folks, but felt that it was important to meet with you and others. At the meeting, we agreed that you would call if you had any questions or needed additional information. Unfortunately, you haven't called but instead have chosen to attack me through emails and your blog. In fact, your blog has an extremely racist comment about asians that never should have been posted.

We have initiated many actions to improve the conditions in ACCD. This includes assembling a "strike team" of folks outside the department who will work on a multitude of issues. We will address these issues and improve the services. I hope you give us a chance to do so.

Again, please call

Bill

--------------------------
Sent from my Blackberry Wireless Handheld


Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:38:01 -0700
To: William Fujioka
Subject: Obstruction of justice investigation

William Fujioka:

Yesterday I was informed that County Counsel completed their investigation into obstruction of justice by Marcia Mayeda and found no wrongdoing. If there was no wrongdoing why did you answer yes with a look of extreme worry and embarrassment on your face when Sharon Harper asked you if that’s what the email was (obstruction of justice) when I showed you the email in person on June 27, 2008? This was witnessed by Lari Sheehan, Janet Taylor, Helen Evers, and Bill Dyer. If Marcia had nothing to hide, why did she instruct her staff to delete emails and empty their trash files so they don’t leave a paper trail? This is not the first time Marcia instructed her staff to delete emails and empty their trash files. She’s done it on at least one other occasion that I’m aware of. Why didn’t you let the Office of County Investigations and the Drug Enforcement Agency conduct the investigation? They were the proper authorities to handle this. Were you afraid that they would find Marcia Mayeda in violation of the law and then you would be forced to take disciplinary action as well as the legal consequences she might face instead of being able to protect her like you’ve done so many times in the past and still continue to do? To what extent did you investigate this? Did you initiate an investigation to deem if any emails were deleted as a result of her directive thus impeding the DEA’s audit?

Obstruction of justice is a serious allegation and yet it appears you didn’t treat it as such. The public will not allow you to sweep this under the rug like you attempted to do with the Zephyr investigation by allowing Marcia to conduct her own investigation. It is very clear at this point that you will let Marcia get away with criminal activity no matter how severe the offense. Upon being appointed to the position of Chief Executive Officer, you told the LA Times (http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2007/07/county-man.html), “I think I can do any damn thing I want with the county charter. I didn't swear to protect that." Ironically, there’s a lot of truth to that. This is an apparent blatant abuse of power and the oath you took when you were sworn in as Chief Executive Officer.

Marcia has fooled you many times in the past. Now the egg is in your face. There’s an old Chinese proverb that sums it up perfectly.

Fool me once
Shame on you
Fool me twice
Shame on me

--------------

In the event that the above link to the LA Times is taken down or the article altered, you can read the original here.

Read More...

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Dr. Mangiamele's audit of the DACC

Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:23:30 -0700
To: Don Knabe, Gloria Molina, Michael Antonovich, Yvonne Burke, Zev Yaroslavsky, Judy Hammond, Lari Sheehan, Sharon Harper, William Fujioka
Subject: Dr. Mangiamele's audit of the DACC

Board of Supervisors and William Fujioka:

I just finished reviewing the 2006-2007 audit of the Department of Animal Care and Control performed by Dr. Dena Mangiamele. The violations pointed out in the audit are not only blatant, but many of them are disgusting and inhumane. The audit is now published on my LA County blog in PDF format for the entire world to read (http://lacdacc.blogspot.com/2008/08/dr-magiameles-report.html).

The violations of Federal Code regarding controlled substances mentioned below are why the Department was audited by the DEA last year. Marcia was made fully aware of those violations by this report and that’s why she obstructed justice by issuing orders to destroy emails.

In addition to the conscious unanesthetized cat mentioned below that was killed by intracardiac injection, which is a violation of California Penal Code Section 597, I’m aware of another situation where the Department seized cats from an animal hoarder that were brought to the Lancaster Animal Shelter. In the back of the animal control truck, animal control officers began killing the scared and terrified cats by intracardiac injection.

Marcia’s press release and 10 page document released on 8/12/2008 is nothing more than Marcia’s attempt to make light of this audit. In the press release Marcia is quoted as saying, “Providing the highest quality animal care and customer service is of utmost importance to the Department and the County of Los Angeles.” Marcia doesn’t care about the animals and neither does the County of Los Angeles. You have turned a blind eye repeatedly no matter how severe the offense.

  • The Department only possessed one controlled substance registration certificate where there should have been one for each shelter
  • At the Downey Animal Shelter on several occasions a graveyard employee falsified records in the controlled substance log by placing the initials of an RVT (not their initials) as the technician who administered the euthanasia solution
  • The Department’s records for controlled substances were inaccurate and not in compliance with state and federal law
  • Schedule II, III, IV, and V controlled substances weren’t stored in a securely locked or substantially constructed cabinet as mandated by Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Section 1301.75
  • A conscious unanesthetized cat was killed at the Lancaster Animal Shelter by intracardiac injection. This resulted in the cat vocalizing and flipping about within its cage for several seconds, kicking food and litter all over the room and then moved to the back of the cage where it subsequently died.
  • A RVT blew the vein of an animal that the RVT was struggling to euthanize at the Carson Animal Shelter
  • The body of a Malamute that had been euthanized and dead for 1.5 hours at the Baldwin Park Animal Shelter was left on the floor of the washrack area instead of being moved to the dead animal freezer
  • A German Shepherd that was turned in for an owner requested euthanasia that was presented as hit by a car and had fractured rear limb was left in the wash rack area of the Downey Animal Shelter without food or water and was unable to move away from his own urination. This dog was not euthanized or taken to taken to an offsite veterinarian, as the shelter veterinarian was off-duty. He was left in these conditions until he was noticed the next day.
  • A Pitt Bull was impounded at the Downey Animal Shelter for an owner requested euthanasia and had a fractured rear limb. This dog did not receive a medical examination, stabilization, or humane euthanasia. Dr. Mangimele was told that this dog would be euthanized after the legal holding period.
  • A German Shepherd was impounded at the Downey Animal Shelter and was unable to move. This dog appeared to be irremediably suffering. He was left overnight in the washrack area. The next morning it was decided that he would be euthanized after the required holding period was up.
  • Euthanasias of animals were preformed in the euthanasia room while dead animals were in the euthanasia room
  • Shelter veterinarians cannot euthanize or direct an RVT or other employee that is euthanasia certified to euthanize an animal that the veterinarian deems irremediably suffering without the approval from a supervisor resulting in animals enduring additional suffering and agony
  • Cats that aren’t scheduled for euthanasia are in clear view of cats being euthanized
  • Anesthesia induction is performed by unregistered veterinary technicians
  • The dead animal freezer at the Downey Animal Shelter contained dead animals that had been in the freezer for several weeks. The freezer was dirty, wet with blood and secretions, and dead bodies were in barrels and on the floor of the freezer.
  • A “caution” animal at the Downey Animal Shelter received lacerations on the lip and mouth and bled extensively due to the makeshift control pole an employee used on it
  • Pre-euthansia anesthetics are not readily available or are not available for animals that require pre-euthanasia anesthetics
  • Non-certified employees performed euthanasia

Read More...

Friday, August 15, 2008

Dr. Mangiamele's Report

Below are links to download Dr. Mangiamele's report by shelter and all reports combined in one PDF file. The reports describe numerous violations of State and Federal law and policy and procedure. County stated in their response to my public record request that it would cost $216.00 (6 hours at $36.00 per hour) to produce the report in electronic format because portions of the record needed to be redacted. Because of this, I requested that they send me the report in hard copy format. So far, the only redaction's I can find are names grouped together on the front page of each report. The effort required in that type of redaction is no where near 6 hours and more like 15 minutes. This is the length County will go to to make it as difficult as possible for a record to be provided in a format that can easily be distributed on the Internet or email because they have a lot to hide. Even though the report should have been mailed to me on either Wednesday, August 6 or Thursday, August 7, the Department didn't mail the report to me until Tuesday, August 12, the same day they posted about the report on their website and Marcia Mayeda issued a press release.

To download the below files, right-click and select Save As. Otherwise, the file will be opened in your web browser.

Read More...

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Marcia Mayeda's strategic plan is an utter failure (Updated)

UPDATE: I received a copy of Dr. Mangiamele's report today. The package that the report was mailed in is post marked August 12, the same day the below web page went up on the Department's website and when Marcia released her press release.

In 2006, Dr. Dena Mangiamele performed an independent review of the Department of Animal "Care" and Control and put together a 580 page report that pointed out numerous violations. On July 3, 2008 I requested a copy of this report via a public record request. On August 5, I mailed the Department a check to cover the costs of postage and photo copying and have not yet received a copy of the report. Yesterday, the following was posted to the Department's website:

Summary of 2006-07 Consultant Recommendations and Department Responses

In 2006 as part of an ongoing improvement program the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control’s director, Marcia Mayeda, requested an independent review of the Department’s entire operations to objectively assess animal care practices and make recommendations for enhancements. This comprehensive study, conducted from late 2006 through mid 2007 by Dena Mangiamele, D.V.M., M.P.H, examined operations efficiencies encompassing all six Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control facilities, and developed long term recommendations for further improvement. Many of these recommendations have already been addressed. These included items that could be immediately remedied through improvements in process and procedural protocols. Longer-term issues, are dependent upon additional staffing and funding for facility enhancements. The Department will continue working with Los Angeles County’s Chief Executive Office and the Board of Supervisors in upcoming budget years to build upon the added staffing and the upcoming funding committed for facility improvements.

Press release
Summary of Consultant Recommendations and Department Responses

I find it too much of a coincidence that not only was this posted to the Department's website yesterday, but Marcia also released a press release yesterday, and all of this occurred after I submitted my public record request right before my copy of the report is due to arrive in the mail. It looks like damage control to me.

Marcia spewed out the following lie in her press release: “Providing the highest quality animal care and customer service is of utmost importance to the Department and the County of Los Angeles." A Department that keeps known animal abusers like Felix Reyes and Melvin Sparks employed and continually and routinely breaks Department and Board of Supervisor Policy and Procedure and State and Federal law shows that the highest quality animal care is not of utmost importance to the Department. A Board of Supervisors and Chief Executive Officer that is so incompetent that they continue to allow Marcia and her Department to get away with violation after violation shows that the highest quality animal care is not of utmost importance to the County of Los Angeles. A Department that doesn't answer their phones, puts members of the public on hold for extended periods of time, incompetently performs their duties, and asks members of the public who document violations to clean the kennels shows that the highest quality customer service is not of utmost importance to the Department and County of Los Angeles. I could go on an on.

Under Marcia's leadership and her strategic plan, the Department has continued to collapse. What has Marcia accomplished in over 7 years as Director? Your guess is as good as mine.

Read More...

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Animal official reviewed

Animal official reviewed

By Troy Anderson, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 08/04/2008 11:06:11 PM PDT

Los Angeles County officials are investigating allegations that the county's animal care director obstructed justice by directing employees to delete e-mails during an audit by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, county Chief Executive Officer Bill Fujioka said Monday.

Fujioka said he asked the County Counsel's Office to review the allegations after meeting recently with an animal rights activist who blogs about alleged abuses of animals at county shelters.

Blog operator Ry an O ls han produced an e-mail dated Oct.4, 2007, and purportedly written by Department of Animal Care & Control Director Marcia Mayeda, Fujioka said.

The e-mail instructs four employees to delete e-mails at a time when the county was under investigation for the use of euthanasia drugs and not complying with euthanasia record-keeping practices.

"The e-mail appears to be accurate," Fujioka said. "Right now, we have asked the County Counsel's Office to investigate the matter and to let me know if it constitutes any violation of the law. We are hoping to have a response from the County Counsel's Office within the next week."

The e-mail appears to have been sent by Mayeda and says: "I agree that everyone did an outstanding job on this matter! However, we do not need a paper trail on this. Everyone, please delete these emails from your computers and empty the trash files. Thanks!"

Mayeda said Monday she could not comment until the County Counsel's Office completes its review.

DEA spokeswoman Sarah Pullen said federal investigators conducted a regulatory audit of Mayeda's agency and found it was basically in compliance.

But Pullen said the DEA was not aware of allegations that Mayeda had allegedly ordered e-mails deleted in connection with the audit.

"Typically, during a routine audit, we won't look at e-mails being deleted," Pullen said. "If there is something else going on that may warrant a different investigation, we'd have to look at a variety of factors.

"If it looks like something criminal was going on, that would require a different type of investigation."

But court documents in one of three lawsuits against the county over alleged abusive treatment of animals at the shelters raise questions about whether the department tampered with records in last year's death of a 10-month-old puppy at the Carson animal shelter.

The documents also allege Mayeda ordered e-mails to be deleted.

"For example, plaintiffs are aware of at least one October 2007 email from Marcia Mayeda to Josie Zabala, among others, in which Ms. Mayeda specifically directs Dr. Zabala and other DACC employees copied on the email to delete emails from their computers and empty the trash files," attorney Melissa Bonfiglio wrote in the March 26 court document.

In an April 18 court document, fellow attorney Orly Degani wrote that the DEA was investigating the department's possible improper use of euthanasia drugs.

The firm filed the lawsuit in December on behalf of the national No Kill Advocacy Center, alleging unlawful and abusive treatment of thousands of dogs and cats at the county's six shelters.

The lawsuit also alleges the county misclassified animals as "ill" or "injured" to kill them before the holding period ended and killed lost animals without making reasonable attempts to find the animals' owners.

Among the other allegations: The county is improperly killing animals before the mandated holding period has expired; failing to provide adequate veterinary care to animals as required by law; failing to scan animals for microchips so owners can be given an opportunity to go to the shelter and pick up their animal; and not providing adequate care to the animals."

County Counsel Ray Fortner did not return calls for comment.

The lawsuit followed protests over last year's puppy death in which the animal reportedly had frozen to death.

Mayeda said the Board of Supervisors has allocated more than $20 million in the last two years to modernize shelter facilities and hire more veterinarians, nurses and staff.

Mayeda said the department operates the largest animal care and control operation in the nation, taking in nearly 90,000 animals a year at shelters in Agoura Hills, Lancaster, Castaic, Carson, Downey and Baldwin Park.

troy.anderson@dailynews.com

Read More...

Monday, August 4, 2008

L.A. County boss faces friction on job

The Citizens' Economy and Efficiency Commission report mentioned below can be downloaded here. I wonder if the "strike teams" William Fujioka mentions below is what David Dijkstra is. He's from the CEO's office and has no experience with animal shelter management.

L.A. County boss faces friction on job

By Troy Anderson, Staff Writer
Article Last Updated: 08/03/2008 11:30:14 PM PDT

A year after restructuring Los Angeles County's top executive office in a bid to boost efficiency, the move has ignited political infighting, accusations of power grabs and micromanagement and concern by some that a new "super-bureaucracy" has emerged.

For years, the Los Angeles County Chief Administrative Office rarely ruffled feathers among the 37 department heads and five elected Board of Supervisors members overseeing the nation's largest county government.

But since giving the Chief Executive Office more power, the county nest has been torn by what some political observers see as a power struggle between Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky - who initially proposed the creation of an elected county executive - and newly appointed Chief Executive Officer Bill Fujioka.

Yaroslavsky, a Democrat and influential member of the board's 3-2 majority, recently said the new management layer of deputy CEOs could be developing a "really unhealthy" culture, "budget decisions were being hatched" without consulting supervisors and communication between supervisors' offices is now reminiscent of how "Russia used to be."

But Fujioka, who is taking several steps including sending "strike teams" into various departments to fix problems, defends his work.

"Like any major initiative, this is a culture shift," he said. "This is a paradigm shift. And as with any major initiative, after one year, you have to make adjustments to ensure whatever we do is as efficient and effective as possible."

Political analysts say they aren't surprised that tensions have developed as more power has been handed to a strong-willed executive the supervisors are finding harder to control.

"It takes awhile to get used to new things, and those that had power before might be giving up some now," said Bob Stern, president of the Center for Governmental Studies. "And that's always hard to do."

Fujioka also is making recommendations for the appointments of five department heads and has started "efficiency" initiatives to save taxpayers money.

He already has recommended the appointment of Dean Logan, whom the board recently named the county's registrar-recorder.

"I can't imagine the supervisors aren't nervous about the possibility they will lose control, for better or worse, for what they were elected to oversee, and losing it to an unelected bureaucracy," said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a political analyst and senior scholar at the University of Southern California School of Policy, Planning & Development.

The power struggle also comes as a recent 26-page report on the CEO structure by the Citizens Economy and Efficiency Commission noted the new system has created another managerial layer with five deputy CEOs - in stark contrast to the office of former CAO David Janssen, whose job was to keep the "budget in the black and keep things quiet."

The report authors wrote that some board offices and department heads believe the deputy CEOs are micromanaging departments and involving themselves in issues that should be the province of department managers, leading to significant delays in responding to constituent concerns and other county problems.

One board office described it as an "extra layer you have to go through, like a wall has been erected; now departments have to climb over the wall to get things done."

Some department heads also complained that the deputies "are more empowered than ever in making decisions" and "attempt to micromanage departments."

Supervisor Don Knabe said he wants to make sure the county is not creating "some new superbureaucracy at the deputy CEO level."

"I think the problem is the CEO is pushing the deputy CEOs to push the department heads," Knabe said. "They end up getting in an overload situation and in some cases it's slowing everything down.

"Problems just sit there and don't get acted upon. The whole purpose of this was accountability and to move the day-to-day operations quicker and faster so we can deal with the broader policy issues."

Report authors noted one of the goals of the new structure was to free up more of the board's time for larger policy debates. But the authors found the percentage of items held at board meetings for policy discussion has not changed.

They wrote that the board has not "let go yet," preferring to focus intensely on oversight and operational issues than policy issues.

And at a board meeting late last month, Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich said he was concerned about the costs of the new structure.

"When the ordinance was being discussed, the CAO at the time indicated that there would be no costs basically associated with it," he said. "However, now in retrospect, we find that it's nearly a $2 million increase in net county cost.

"So did the commission look at the increased costs to determine whether the benefits outweigh the costs?"

Although the commission didn't explore the costs, a Daily News review in March found that since the new structure went into effect, the CEO's office budget has surged nearly 50 percent from $27.7 million in 2006-07 to $41.2 million in 2007-08.

The new deputy CEOs draw annual salaries of more than $200,000 each, and their executive secretaries make $73,000 a year or more.

But Fujioka said he is working to address supervisors' and the commission report's concerns and notes the report also says the new structure has resulted in significant progress in improving county services.

He said the report notes "increased collaboration and communication" between departments that long operated as independent "silos."

And some department heads say Fujioka's teams have been helpful. A "strike team" recently was sent to the Department of Children and Family Services after a series of audits found procurement, contracting and other problems.

"The CEO is helping us in coming up with creative ideas and how to utilize less resources to get the job done," DCFS Director Trish Ploehn said. "We are facing a potential ($25 million) budget cut with the state budget, so it's critically important my administrative structures are streamlined, and this has been a big help."

Fujioka also sent a "strike team" into the health department to address problems at the former Martin Luther King/Drew Medical Center and to find ways to save money in the health department.

Department of Health Services Interim Director John Schunhoff said the team has been helpful in restructuring the MLK clinic and identifying problem employees who had been shuffled around the county.

"Another team is coming in to help us shore up our human resources operations, including performance management, which has to do with discipline to really strengthen it and to try to make sure we have a system in place to take care of these issues so they don't happen again," Schunhoff said.

But in response to the commission's report, the supervisors late last month directed Fujioka to meet with the supervisors' chiefs of staff to review eight recommendations and come up with a joint proposal for the board's approval.

"This is the county of Los Angeles, which has been in place for more than 100 years," Fujioka said. "To change this structure is going to take time. The fact we have multiple instances of better and strong collaboration and coordination after only one year is significant.

"I think it would be a tragedy if we returned to the status quo. We just need to continue working collectively and collaboratively together. It's my goal to make this work and move it forward."

troy.anderson@dailynews.com 213-974-8985

Read More...

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Abuse of the donation fund

I uncovered a document from April 2006 where $205,000 was proposed to be taken from the Department's donation fund and moved to the Department's revenue fund. I was told that this was approved. Out of this $205,000, only $18,000 went to the animals. Below is an outline of how this money was proposed to be spent. The Department got a new VoIP phone system, new database system with better integration with the County's e-Commerce system, and the Treasurer-Tax Collector's Department took over animal licensing operations while animals suffer in the Department's shelters. This goes to show you where the Department's priorities are.

  • $104,000 would be used to pay the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Department to take over control of the Department’s animal licensing operations. Those operations are currently handled in-house, by a limited departmental staff. The Treasurer-Tax Collector has the capacity, ability, and experience to process animal license renewals in a timely manner. This would improve the efficiency of this operation for the Department.
  • $75,000 would be used to complete payment of a Voice-Over-Internet Phone system. The Department is completing transition to a newer, more modern and efficient telephone communications system. Much of that work already has been done and the final $75,000 would pay for completion of the project. 
  • $18,000 to purchase six pulse oximeter machines for each of the Department’s veterinary medical clinics. This machine monitors the vital signs of animals that have been anesthetized for surgery and provides a valuable medical tool in assuring the health of animals undergoing surgical procedures.
  • $8,000 to purchase database software for the Department’s computer system that will not only significantly improve the performance of that system, but will allow it to link directly to the County’s e-commerce capacity.
You can view a copy of this document here.

Read More...

Friday, August 1, 2008

Carson Animal Shelter visit on 7/26/2008

On 7/26/2008 I visited the Carson Animal Shelter and noticed that there were dogs locked on the outside of their cage without water, cages full of feces, and dogs laying in their feces. It smelled and there were flies everywhere because of the unsanitary conditions. It appears that the Carson Animal Shelter is back to violating policy and procedure and the law. You can view a video of the conditions below.


Read More...

David Dijkstra appointed as Chief Deputy Director

For over a year, the Chief Deputy Director position in the Department of Animal Care and Control remained vacant. In June 2008, the Chief Executive Office identified somebody from their office to take over as Chief Deputy Director. On 7/2/2008 it was announced to the Department of Animal "Care" and Control in a memo and on 7/16/2008 it was announced to the Board of Supervisors in a memo that David Dijkstra would be appointed to that position.

In the William Fujioka memo, it states that David Dijkstra's responsibilities are, "managing through subordinate staff the Department's operation and administration functions of Human Resources, Budget, and Fiscal, Contracts, Information Technology, Licensing, Outreach and Enforcement, and Shelter Services." Isn't all of that Marcia's responsibilities? What exactly will Marcia's responsibilities be now that David is Chief Deputy Director? Is this the CEO's way of forcing Marcia to resign? If so, I applaud this tactic.

Read More...

Email from former Carson Animal Shelter RVT

Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:39:59 -0700
To: Don Knabe, Gloria Molina, Michael Antonovich, Yvonne Burke, Zev Yaroslavsky, Judy Hammond, Lari Sheehan, Sharon Harper, William Fujioka
Subject: Email from former Carson Animal Shelter RVT

Board of Supervisors and William Fujioka:

I received the below email today from Lori Kuhn, a former RVT at the Carson Animal Shelter. In addition to cats running out of the dead animal freezer, I’m aware of a Chow that was “killed” and walked out of the dead animal freezer three days later to be killed yet again. The Federal Drug Enforcement Agency violations described below eventually resulted in an investigation by the DEA last year which Marcia Mayeda attempted to obstruct by issuing orders to destroy emails.

The Department of Animal “Care” and Control’s practices are cruel, barbaric, and inhumane. By continuing to allow Marcia Mayeda and her Department to break Department and Board of Supervisor Policy and Procedure and State and Federal law no matter how severe the offense, you are just as liable.

------ Forwarded Message
From: Lori Kuhn
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT)

My name is Lori Kuhn. I am a registered veterinary technician in the state of California. I was employed at the Carson Shelter in LA County for 3 months back in 2003. I witnessed a lot of animal neglect while working there. I tried on several occasions to talk with the director, Marcia Mayada, she would refuse to talk to me, instead I was fired.

I was amazed that I seemed to be the only one there who had feelings towards animals, and on several occasions, was told by other staff members, including the veterinarian, Dr. Pete, that I should be working at a humane society, not a high kill shelter! On a daily basis I saw dogs being dragged with a rope tied around their neck to the euthanasia room. I saw the other technician Conrad, gambling on the internet each day instead of doing his job. I saw cats running out of the freezer at least three times, because they were put into the barrels alive. I saw cockroaches crawling all over the kennels at night. I would stay late every single night to feed cats that were left without any food or water! And I was told that I had to kill wildlife, hundreds of possums were brought in in traps by the public and the patrol officers to be euthanized daily, the worst for me was killing the beautiful raccoons that should have been turned over to the wildlife department for release.

After leaving the shelter I wrote a letter to the AVMA who did an inspection. I was told that they were in direct violation by the DEA for having drugs unlocked and a general lack of legal drug logs. Record keeping was nill. Conrad the technician who I worked with provided no training for me whatsoever, he basically ignored me, and then complained about me to the supervisors. I am also very sorry to say that the tech who was hired after me killed herself while on the job with euthanasia solution.

The shelter needs help, hopefully those reading this understand my frustration.

Sincerely,
Lori Kuhn RVT

Read More...

County denies release of Felix Reyes abuse video footage

In response to a public record request I submitted requesting the video footage of Felix Reyes abusing a Rottweiler, Los Angeles County responded by stating, “The records you requested include personnel information that is protected under California Constitution Article 1, Section 1: “Article 1, Section 1’s ‘inalienable right’ of privacy is a ‘fundamental interest’ of our society, essential to those rights guaranteed by the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution” Board of Trustees v. Sup. Ct., (1981) 119 CA3d 516 at 524; and also by Govt. Code Sec. 6254(c); 6245(f); 6254(k); and Sec. 6255. Therefore, the information is exempt from disclosure.”

Why is County covering up the video footage? It's in the best interest of the public to release this footage as this animal abuser is still employed by the County at the waste of taxpayer dollars. County is defrauding the taxpaying public by covering this up and refusing to release the video footage. The District Attorney's Office choose not to prosecute despite this report and video evidence. In response to a member of the public, Supervisor Zev Yaroslavky categorized this abuse as a, "very inhumane act." Why is Felix Reyes not in jail and fired? I urge you to call and email the following people and ask them this question and demand that the video footage of Felix Reyes abusing the Rottweiler be released.

Marcia Mayeda
Director, Department of Animal Care and Control
County of Los Angeles
Email: MMayeda@animalcare.lacounty.gov
Phone: (562) 728-4610

David Dijkstra
Chief Deputy Director, Department of Animal Care and Control
County of Los Angeles
Email: DDijkstra@animalcare.lacounty.gov

Wendy Watanabe
Acting Auditor-Controller
County of Los Angeles
Email: WWatanabe@auditor.lacounty.gov
Phone: (213) 974-8301

William T. Fujioka
Chief Executive Officer
County of Los Angeles
Email: BFujioka@ceo.lacounty.gov
Phone: (213) 974-1101

Lari Sheehan
Deputy Chief Executive Officer
County of Los Angeles
Email: LSheehan@ceo.lacounty.gov
Phone: (213) 974-1101

Gloria Molina
Supervisor, First District
County of Los Angeles
Email: Molina@lacbos.org
Phone: (213) 974-4111

Yvonne B. Burke
Supervisor, Second District
County of Los Angeles
Email: YBurke@lacbos.org
Phone: (213) 974-2222

Zev Yaroslavsky
Supervisor, Third District
County of Los Angeles
Email: ZYarosla@lacbos.org
Phone: (213) 974-3333

Don Knabe
Supervisor, Fourth District
County of Los Angeles
Email: DKnabe@lacbos.org
Phone: (213) 974-4444

Michael D. Antonovich
Supervisor, Fifth District
County of Los Angeles
Email: MAntonovich@lacbos.org
Phone: (213) 974-5555

Steve Cooley
District Attorney
County of Los Angeles
Email: SCooley@da.lacounty.gov

Debbie Knaan
Deputy District Attorney
County of Los Angeles
Email: DKnaan@da.lacounty.gov

District Attorney's Office
County of Los Angeles
210 West Temple Street, Suite 18000
Los Angeles, CA 90012-3210
Phone: (213) 974-3512

Read More...

Animal control? Hardly, they say

Animal control? Hardly, they say

Dead dog rankles family as officials delay body pickup


This story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press
Saturday, July 26, 2008.


By ALISHA SEMCHUCK
Valley Press Staff Writer

PALMDALE - For four days, Brandy wouldn't leave Anakin's side.

The problem? Anakin, a chocolate Labrador retriever, had died and Brandy, a dachshund mix, stood guard over the body as the dog's owner waited for assistance from the Lancaster Animal Shelter.

Now, the owner wants to know why it took four days for an Animal Control officer to respond.

"We called (the shelter) in the afternoon (on July 17)," Palmdale resident Maria Mendoza said. "They told us they would come between 7:30 and 10:30 at night. They didn't show up."

Mendoza, 59, said she discovered Anakin's body at the side of her house when she went to feed him.

"I called him, walked around the house. He wasn't moving," she said.

His death didn't come unexpectedly. Mendoza said the dog's veterinarian gave him three weeks to live at the most because the animal was suffering kidney failure. But the family wanted to keep him home until the end.

"We had him 11 years. He was our family, you could say," Mendoza said.

Cynthia Ramirez, Mendoza's 14-year-old granddaughter, said they called the Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and Control because her grandmother, a disabled stroke victim, could not lift or carry the 90-pound dog. Mendoza's daughter, Marie Mendoza, lives with her, but is also disabled.

"On Friday we called them again," the older Mendoza said. "And we called on Saturday and Sunday. They said they were short-staffed and had other calls."

She didn't know who answered the phone at Animal Control. "My daughter did all the talking," she said.

The dog was finally picked up Monday morning.

"Not only is it devastating for the dog's loss, but several bugs have been eating him," Ramirez said.

Though the dog had died, Ramirez said he deserved better treatment than that. Also, she claimed the dog's carcass had become a health hazard.

Ramirez contacted Actors and Others for Animals, a nonprofit animal rights group, to see if it could nudge Animal Control into action. Susan Taylor, the group's executive director, wrote back, telling Ramirez that Animal Control said it had picked up the dog at 10 a.m. Monday.

Tony Bell, communications deputy for county Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich, said Animal Control officials' standard is to pick up dead animals within 24 hours.

He confirmed that Marcia Mayeda, director of Animal Control, had received an e-mail from the animal rights group.

"Marcia responded right away and said the dog was picked up hours ago," Bell said. "Our office will be conducting a thorough investigation into what happened in this case.

"We want to get all the facts. And we will direct the department to take corrective action to ensure this doesn't happen again."

After an Animal Control officer removed Anakin's body. Mendoza said another granddaughter, Brenda Cortes, found his tail in the driveway. The animal had decayed from the weather and the bugs.

"We have it (the tail) here. We're going to dig a hole and bury it," Mendoza said.

As for Brandy the dachshund, she's almost back to her old self. She refused food the entire time she watched over Anakin, Mendoza said Tuesday. "She started eating yesterday after he left."

asemchuck@avpress.com

Read More...